/AnMtgsAbsts2009.52265 Soil Carbon Sequestration Under Agroforestry: A Multi-Location, Multi-System Study.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC, Second Floor

Ramachandran Nair1, Vimala Nair2, Solomon Haile2, Subhrajit K. Saha1, David S. Howlett1, Asako Takimoto3, Emanuela Gama-Rodrigues4 and Rafael G. Tonucci1, (1)School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Univ. of Florida, Center for Subtropical Agroforestry, Gainesville, FL
(2)Soil and Water Science, Univ. of Florida, Center for Subtropical Agroforestry, Gainesville, FL
(3)Univ. of Florida, Center for Subtropical Agroforestry, Islamabad, FL, Pakistan
(4)Soil Laboratory, Univ. Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil
Poster Presentation
  • AF_SOC_Poster - Nair et al. 279-5.pptx (4.8 MB)
  • Abstract:
    The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) allows the use of carbon (C) sequestration through afforestation and reforestation (A & R) as greenhouse (GHG) offset activities. Consequently, the role of tree-based land-use systems such as agroforestry as a strategy for C sequestration has raised considerable expectations. During the past five years, we studied soil C sequestration under different agroforestry systems in five countries: silvopasture in Ultisols and Spodosols in Florida, USA; the traditional “dehesa” (silvopasture) in northern Spain;  multispecies homegardens in Kerala, India; traditional intercropping under scattered trees in Segou, Mali; shaded cacao system in Bahia, Brazil; and silvopasture under Eucalyptus sp. in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The studies involved some uniform procedures: soil fractionation into different particle-size classes, and use of stable isotope ratio to determine, in tree + grass systems, the contribution of trees and grasses to soil C in depth classes up to 1 m depth. In addition to the known facts about the extreme variability in C content of soils, the study pointed to several important observations. These included: i) tree-based agricultural systems, compared to treeless systems, can store significantly more C in deeper layers of soils under similar agroecological conditions; ii) higher SOC content is associated with higher species richness and tree density, especially in the upper 50 cm soil and in the <53 µm soil fraction; iii) soil near the tree, compared to away from the tree, had higher C storage iv) trees (C3 plants) contribute more C in the silt- + clay- sized (<53 µm) fractions than C4 plants in deeper soil profile; v) long-term presence of trees on landscape promoted storage of more stable C in soil; and vi) although traditional agroforestry systems had larger C stock than the improved systems, they have only limited potential for sequestering additional C.