106-9 Differences in Ryegrass Cultivars When Used As a Nursecrop.

Poster Number 724

See more from this Division: C05 Turfgrass Science
See more from this Session: Genetics, Breeding and Stress Responses of Turfgrass Graduate Student Competition
Monday, October 22, 2012
Duke Energy Convention Center, Exhibit Hall AB, Level 1
Share |

Tanner Arwine, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, Raymondo Molina, Tarleton State University, Killeen, TX, Hennen D. Cummings, Environmental and Agricultural Management, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, John R. Bow, Texas Agrilife Research-Stephenville, Stephenville, TX and James P. Muir, Texas A&M AgriLife Research-Stephenville, Stephenville, TX
The competitive nature of annual ryegrass has caused problems across Texas roadsides when used as a nurse crop. Two less competitive genotypes of annual ryegrass, dwarf and early-maturing, were evaluated to determine if they can provide for erosion control without interfering with the establishment of wildflowers and perennial grasses. Plots were set up in four climate zones in Texas to measure the variation between zones. Wild flower, annual ryegrass, and perennial grass were seeded at different rates to conclude the best rates. Plots were split into mowed versus non-mowed to determine if mowing affects wildflower and perennial grass establishment. Data collected included species, height, numbers of plants, and percent groundcover. The objective is to design a protocol for establishing winter groundcover that does not out compete with desired warm-season plants.
See more from this Division: C05 Turfgrass Science
See more from this Session: Genetics, Breeding and Stress Responses of Turfgrass Graduate Student Competition