49-2 Biomass Production and Ecosystem Services in Iowa Biofuel Cropping Systems.

See more from this Division: Agriculture and Natural Resources Science for Climate Variability and Change: Transformational Advancements in Research, Education and Extension
See more from this Session: Carbon, Nitrogen, Energy and Water Footprints In Agriculture Production: Changing Practices and Opportunities
Monday, October 22, 2012: 1:15 PM
Duke Energy Convention Center, Junior Ballroom B, Level 3
Share |

Michael Thompson1, Robert Anex2, Elizabeth Bach3, Teresita Chua1, Richard Cruse1, Aaron Daigh1, Ranae Dietzel1, Matthew Helmers4, Kirsten Hofmockel5, Robert Horton1, Meghann Jarchow1, Matt Liebman1, Fernando Miguez6, Virginia Nichols1, Fritzie Rivas1, Thomas Sauer7 and David Sundberg1, (1)Agronomy Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
(2)Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
(3)Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
(4)Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
(5)Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
(6)Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
(7)USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture & the Environment, Ames, IA
The Comparison of Biofuel Cropping Systems (COBS) project at Iowa State University is designed to provide a quantitative, side-by-side comparison of corn and multi-species perennial cropping systems. We are making comprehensive, long-term comparisons of contrasting biomass feedstock production systems with respect to: (a) potential for biomass production, fossil-fuel replacement, and net energy returns, (b) potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to increase belowground carbon storage, and (c) potential to maintain soil quality and reduce water-quality impacts of nutrient exports. The COBS project investigates trade-offs and opportunities to optimize system performance relative to multiple criteria.

The experiment is large-scale (24 plots, each 27 m x 61 m, four replications of each system) and compares biomass production, fossil fuel replacement value, and environmental impacts for continuous corn grown for grain and stover removal with and without a rye cover crop; multispecies perennial crops grown for aboveground biomass with and without fertilizer; and a conventional corn-soybean grain system, used as a comparison baseline.

Aboveground biomass. Over four growing seasons, multi-species perennial systems fertilized with a moderate rate of N provided about 70% of the aboveground biomass of corn that had been fertilized at substantially higher N rates. The multi-species perennial systems not receiving N fertilizer produced about 70% of the aboveground biomass of the fertilized perennial systems and about 50% of the biomass of corn. A cool season (C3) grass, Canada wild rye, and multiple non-legume forbs dominated the fertilized perennial treatment, whereas warm season (C4) perennial grasses, especially big bluestem and Indiangrass, dominated the unfertilized perennial treatment. C4 grasses have a higher liquid-fuel conversion ratio and a higher heating value than do C3 grasses, and a high energy return on investment might be obtained from multi-species perennial systems that do not receive energy-intensive N fertilizer, but which do produce high-quality C4 grass feedstocks.

Belowground biomass. Root growth rates were estimated by using root in-growth cores. In addition, root biomass to a depth of 100 cm in the research plots was quantified. Multi-species perennial plots had approximately 8 – 12 times more roots and root carbon than corn plots. The unfertilized perennial-system plots produced more root biomass than fertilized perennial-system plots, despite having lower aboveground biomass. We investigated the potential for microbial degradation of cellulose in the crop roots by assaying glucosidase activity in several aggregate size fractions of soil of the experimental treatments. The greater enzyme activity in the multi-species perennial crops likely resulted from the greater presence of C, specifically cellulose-containing plant tissues including roots. N fertilization did not increase C-hydrolyzing enzyme activity in the perennial treatments.

Nitrate loss. We compared the impacts of multi-species perennial feedstock production vs. corn production on water quantity and water quality (nitrate flux) by quantifying total subsurface drainage and nutrient export with the subsurface drainage. The volume of water carried by tile lines from the multi-species perennial treatments was less than that of the annual cropping systems. In addition, the cumulative loss of nitrate N over the 2010 growing season was 20-30 times less in the perennial systems. In 2011, nitrate loss was about 5 to 20 times less in the perennial plots than in the annually cropped plots.

Nitrous oxide emissions. Preliminary assessment of the 2011 growing season shows that corn, continuous corn, and continuous corn with a winter cover crop produced 17, 15, and 13 times more N2O than the unfertilized multi-species perennial treatment. In contrast, soybeans and the fertilized perennial system produced only 2 and 3 times as much N2O as the unfertilized perennial system. Even when fertilized, cumulative N2O emissions from the perennial system were significantly less than those from corn systems.

See more from this Division: Agriculture and Natural Resources Science for Climate Variability and Change: Transformational Advancements in Research, Education and Extension
See more from this Session: Carbon, Nitrogen, Energy and Water Footprints In Agriculture Production: Changing Practices and Opportunities