166-13 Effects On Soil Properties and Biomass by Biochar From Slow Pyrolysis, Fast Pyrolysis and Gasification.

See more from this Division: A05 Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Biochar Effects On the Environment and Agricultural Productivity: I
Tuesday, November 2, 2010: 2:00 PM
Hyatt Regency Long Beach, Beacon Ballroom B, Third Floor
Share |

Nils Borchard1, Jan Siemens1, Andreas Moeller2, Brenton M. Ladd3, Wulf Amelung4 and Jens Utermann2, (1)Soil Science and Soil Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
(2)Soil, Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover, Germany
(3)School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
(4)University of Bonn, Bonn, GERMANY
Source material and pyrolysis process used to create biochar may affect the physical and chemical properties of biochar, and its suitability as a soil conditioner and/or fertilizer. However, data on the effect of different types of biochar on soil fertility are sparse. We measured chemical and physical properties of biochars made by flash pyrolysis (PC), gasification (GC) and from conventional charcoal (CC). We determined the influence of the application of these forms of biochar (1.5 wt %) on soil properties and biomass yield and composition of maize (Zea mays L.) for a silty and a sandy topsoil. The effects of biochar type were assessed using ANOVA and biochar compound related effects were analyzed by principle component analysis (PCA). PC contained 1.8 % ash, low concentrations of nutrients and had a pH of 4.2. Ash content and therefore nutrient content in GC and CC were higher (GC 12.2 %, CC 2. 4%), and pH values were greater than 7.0. Biochar-C, expressed as BPCA-C content (g CBPCA kg-1 soil), influenced total soil carbon content (Ct g kg-1) and the chemical composition of soil organic matter (HI: mgHCg-1TOC, OI: mgCO2g-1TOC). GC increased soil pH and concentrations of K and Mg due to its high ash contents. One year after GC addition available P concentrations in the sandy topsoil and nitrate concentrations in the silty topsoil exceeded those of the respective controls. The addition of biochar did not affect the water holding capacity of either soil, but actual water content of CC and GC amended sandy soil exceeded gravimetric water contents of controls by more than 20%. The addition of CC to the silt soil increased gravimetric water content by 6%, and addition of PC reduced water content by 11%. The PCA revealed that the δ13C ratio and uptake of Ca2+ and Mg2+ of Maize plants loaded on the first principal component together with the BPCA-C content in silt soil (δ13C, Ca2+ and Mg2+: opposite signs). In summary, our results suggest that gasification biochar and charcoal have the potential to increase soil fertility by increasing pH and plant available nutrient concentrations. In contrast, the addition of PC reduced soil pH to unfavourable levels, reduced water retention, and did not increase nutrients availability soil. Considering source and type of biochar seems pivotal for assessing its potential as fertilizer or soil conditioner.
See more from this Division: A05 Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Biochar Effects On the Environment and Agricultural Productivity: I