/AnMtgsAbsts2009.53628 Effects of Ammonia Volatilization Mitigation Options On Greenhouse Gas Emissions From a Paddy Field Fertilized with Anaerobically Digested Cattle Slurry.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009: 11:45 AM
Convention Center, Room 336, Third Floor

Khin Thawda Win1, Nonaka RYOKO1, Koki TOYOTA2, Takashi MOTOBAYASHI3 and Masaaki HOSOMI4, (1)Graduate School of Bio- Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
(2)Graduate School of Bio- Applications and Systems Engineering, Professor. Tokyo Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
(3)Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
(4)Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract:
We reported that NH3 volatilization from a paddy field planted with a whole crop rice variety and fertilized with anaerobically digested cattle slurry (ADCS) was suppressed by adding wood vinegar or by managing the floodwater level high.  To evaluate the effects of the NH3 mitigation options on emissions of CH4 and N2O, a lysimeter experiment (1 m square with 0.5 m depth) was done in this study, since these are generally considered to enhance CH4 emission. Four treatments and each three replicated lysimeters were prepared: 1) chemical fertilizer (CF), 2) ADCS, 3) ADCS + wood vinegar (WV) and 4) ADCS + deeper floodwater (ca. 10 cm, 3-4 cm in the other treatments) (DFW) just before application. Fertilization rate was 30 g NH4+-N m-2 (basal and two times top-dressing) and NH3, CH4 and N2O emissions were monitored. The results revealed that NH3 volatilization loss in the ADCS treatment throughout a growing season was 2.7 g NH3-N m-2 which was significantly reduced by 79% and 55% in the ADCS + WV and ADCS + DFW treatments, respectively. A total amount of CH4 emitted in the ADCS treatments in a growing period was not significantly enhanced by the NH3 volatilization mitigation options (146 ± 80, 147 ± 12 and 153 ± 52 g CH4 m-2 in the ADCS, ADCS + WV and ADCS + DFW, respectively), although these values were ca. 2.5 times higher than that in the CF treatment. Net negative N2O emissions in a growing period were observed in all the treatments. Results revealed that NH3 ammonia mitigation options reduced NH3 volatilization while not having a negative impact in greenhouse gases, CH4 and N2O emissions.