539-20 Response of Contrasting Alfalfa Cultivars to Summer Irrigation in Tasmania, Australia.

Poster Number 265

See more from this Division: A06 International Agronomy
See more from this Session: Advances in International Agronomy (includes Graduate Student Competition) (Posters)

Monday, 6 October 2008
George R. Brown Convention Center, Exhibit Hall E

Keith Pembleton1, Richard Rawnsley1, Danny Donaghy1, Jeffrey Volenec2 and Stuart Smith3, (1)Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, University of Tasmania, Burnie, Australia
(2)Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN
(3)Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries and Water, Kings Meadows, Australia
Abstract:
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) has been identified as a potential summer forage for Tasmanian dairying.  In the cool temperate environment of Tasmania an important factor in deciding to irrigate summer forages is the expected production response, known as marginal water use efficiency (WUE) of the species or cultivar.  This study aimed to identify the effect of cultivar on the marginal WUE of alfalfa in Tasmania
Dry matter (DM) yield of four alfalfa cultivars grown with or without irrigation over the 2007/08 spring and summer were monitored at Elliott, Tasmania (41°4’48”S, 145°46’12” E, 1200mm annual rainfall, Humic Eutrodox soil).  Cultivars chosen to represent a wide range of fall dormancy (FD) consisted of DuPuits (FD3), Grasslands Kaituna (FD4.5), SARDI-7 (FD7) and SARDI-10 (FD10). 

Under rain-fed conditions fall-dormant cultivars produced significantly more (P<0.05) DM than fall-active cultivars. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in DM yields between cultivars when irrigated.  Differences in marginal WUE existed between alfalfa cultivars with SARDI-10 having significantly greater (P<0.05) marginal WUE than Grasslands Kaituna or SARDI-7 (Table 1). 
Although there were differences in marginal WUE between alfalfa cultivars, it is concluded from this study that little benefit can be gained from irrigating one alfalfa cultivar in preference to another as irrigated yields were similar among cultivars.  However, it is recommended that alfalfa be irrigated in preference to perennial grass pastures, as marginal WUE is substantially higher than the industry average pasture response of 10 kg DM mm-1.

Table 1. Yield and marginal water use efficiency (WUE) over spring and summer of four alfalfa cultivars grown with or without irrigation at Elliott, Tasmania, Australia

Cultivar
Raingrown
Yield (kg ha-1)
Irrigation
Yield (kg ha-1)
Marginal WUE
(kg mm-1)
DuPutis
7576
13952
18.75
Grasslands Kaituna
7817
13723
17.37
SARDI-7
7243
13171
17.43
SARRD-10
6791
14039
21.32
LSD (P=0.05)
548
ns
3.28

See more from this Division: A06 International Agronomy
See more from this Session: Advances in International Agronomy (includes Graduate Student Competition) (Posters)