Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Convention Center, Exhibit Hall BC, Second Floor
Emily Carter1, Marco Galang2, Daniel Markewitz3 and Larry Morris2, (1)USDA-Forest Service, Auburn, AL
(2)Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA
(3)Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA
Prescribed burning is a common
practice in forest management for the purpose of reducing fuel loads, regenerating
native plants, and improving wildlife habitat. The impact of prescribed burning
on erosion response of soils in the southeastern U.S. has been reported but results
have been mixed. A study was initiated
in 2003 to investigate the erosion response of loblolly pine stands with
varying fuel loads to prescribed burning.
The study site was located in the Long Cane Ranger District, Sumter National Forest, South Carolina. The landscape of the study site is moderately
steep to steep, highly dissected, and covered by an extensive network of
gullies. Soils within the study area were
primarily classified as Ultisols with the most common
soil association to be Cecil-Lloyd-Madison. Three treatments and a control were
established as a randomized complete block design (RBD) with treatments
consisting of 1) prescribed burn with low fuel load; 2) prescribed burn with
high fuel load; 3) prescribed burn after mechanical chipping treatment; and 4) control
- no prescribed burn. Steel framed plots
measuring approximately 5 x 10 meters connected to tipping bucket collections
systems were placed in three locations in each treatment area. Each treatment area was monitored prior to and
after application of prescribed burning treatments and data related to total
runoff, rainfall, sediment and nutrient loss were collected. Runoff increased after application of
prescribed burning treatments in comparison to preburn
but declined with time as vegetation recovery occurred. Soil and nutrient data analyses are underway.