Abstract:
Manipulating fertilizer N inputs is a readily accessible management tool for increasing crop N use efficiency, with fertilizer N rate a crucial parameter for estimating both yield and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in row–crop systems.
Quantification of the trade–offs between N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, crop yield and fertilizer N rate is essential for proposing strategies which optimize productivity at economically and environmentally favorable N rates.
The relationship between fertilizer N rate and subsequent N<sub>2</sub>O emissions is typically assumed linear and insensitive to increasing N rate. However, recent studies at the Kellogg Biological Station in SW Michigan, in winter wheat and corn, using automated chambers to monitor near–continuous N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from a field scale, rain–fed N fertility gradient, suggest that a non–linear relationship is more applicable.
Emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O in both crops were low at fertilizer N rates below or coincident to those optimizing crop yield, but sharply increased thereafter. This threshold response to increasing fertilizer N rate in row–crop agriculture suggests a substantial decrease in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions could be achieved with moderate reductions in N rate and little or no yield penalty.
Our data, in conjunction with a recently developed approach for determining economically profitable N application rates for optimized crop yield in the Corn Belt states, have potential to be incorporated into agricultural N<sub>2</sub>O emission reduction protocols and utilized in future projects suitable for inclusion in the burgeoning nutrient cap–and–trade markets.
We will present results from our 2007–2009 field seasons and outline a protocol framework for reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from row–crop agriculture in the US Midwest.