680-9 Reducing Nitrate Loss in Tile Drainage Water with Cover Crops and Watertable Management.

See more from this Division: S06 Soil & Water Management & Conservation
See more from this Session: Soil Quality and Cover Crops (includes Graduate Student Competition)

Tuesday, 7 October 2008: 11:15 AM
George R. Brown Convention Center, 360AB

Craig Drury, Chin Tan, W. Reynolds, Tom Oloya, Tiequan Zhang, Thomas Welacky and John Gaynor, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada
Abstract:
Nitrate leached from agricultural soils can be both an environmental concern when it enters rivers and lakes, and a human health concern when it enters aquifers used for potable water. Management practices such as cover crops and controlled tile drainage – subirrigation (CDS) have been identified as possible ways to reduce nitrate losses.  A 6-yr study (1999-2005) was conducted in Southwestern Ontario in which the effectiveness of a winter wheat cover crop and CDS were assessed for a corn-soybean rotation. The four treatments included: cover crop with and without traditional tile drainage (DR), and cover crop with and without CDS.   Corn received 15 kg N ha-1 at planting and 150 kg N ha-1 as a sidedress application at the 6 leaf stage.  No fertilizer N was applied to soybean.  Surface runoff and tile drainage water were collected using autosamplers and analyzed for nitrate-N.  Relative to no cover crop, winter wheat reduced surface runoff by 10.9% and increased tile drainage by 8.2% for DR; and it reduced surface runoff by 29.4% and increased tile drainage by 35% for CDS. The flow weighted mean (FWM) nitrate concentration in tile drainage from the DR treatment was 9.29 mg N L-1 and this was reduced by 19.5% when the cover crop was planted (7.48 mg N L-1).  The CDS system reduced FWM nitrate concentrations in tile drainage by 15.5% (7.85 mg N L-1) compared to DR.  However when both the cover crop and CDS were used, the FWM nitrate concentrations (5.01 mg N L-1) were 46% lower than those obtained using no cover crop and DR. The 6-yr cumulative nitrate loss with the DR treatment (101 kg N ha-1) was reduced by 12% with cover crops (89.1 kg N ha-1) and by 37.5% with the CDS system (63.3 kg N ha-1) whereas when both cover crops and CDS were used, cumulative nitrate loss was reduced by 46.7% to 53.9 kg N ha-1.  Although the cover crop assimilated residual N in the soil profile, this benefit is partially offset by increased tile flow. Hence both a cover crop and CDS can effectively reduce nitrate losses from agricultural soils, and they are particularly effective when used in combination.

See more from this Division: S06 Soil & Water Management & Conservation
See more from this Session: Soil Quality and Cover Crops (includes Graduate Student Competition)