Fred Rhoton1, William Emmerich2, Mark Nearing3, Jerry Ritchie4, and David DiCarlo1. (1) USDA-ARS-NSL, 598 McElroy Drive, Oxford, MS 38655, (2) USDA-ARS-SWRC, 2000 E Allen Rd, Tucson, AZ 85719, (3) USDA-ARS, USDA-ARS SW Watershed Res. Cntr., 2000 E Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719, (4) USDA-ARS-HRSL, 10300 Baltimore Ave, Beltsville, MD 20705
As water quality standards become more stringent, a knowledge of primary sediment source areas
in watersheds becomes increasingly important from the standpoint of compliance through the
design of efficient management practices that will reduce sediment and chemical loadings of
receiving waters to acceptable levels. The objective of this research was to use a soil
geomorphology approach to sediment sourcing to better define the effects of soil variability on
erodibility and sediment transport at the watershed scale. Each major soil mapping unit in six
subwatersheds (SWs) was sampled along transects positioned to include the normal soil
geomorphological features associated with a given mapping unit. Soil samples collected from the
surface 5.0 cm were characterized for basic physical and chemical properties, radionuclides, and
stable C isotopes. These data were used as fingerprints for sediment source areas in the
watershed. Suspended sediment samples collected from supercritical flumes at the mouth of each
SW were analyzed identically. An aggregation index (AI), calculated for the soils in each SW as
function of water dispersible clay/total clay), and used as an indicator of soil erodibility. The
physical, chemical, and isotopic signatures of the suspended sediment collected at the six flumes
were used in a multivariate mixing model to identify the primary contributing source. The results
suggested that the SWs with the lowest soil AI were contributing the greatest amounts of
sediment, which was confirmed by the stable C isotope data.