Current methodology to differentiate between N
2O production from nitrification, nitrifier denitrification and denitrification is based on the inhibitors acetylene and oxygen. As several problems are associated with this approach
1, we developed a novel
15N,
18O enrichment approach for this purpose. This new enrichment technique was based on a method with single- and double-
15N-labelled ammonium nitrate
2. A new treatment with
18O-labelled H
2O was introduced. This exploits the fact that ammonia oxidisers use O
2 from soil air for the oxidation of NH
3, but H
2O for the oxidation of the resulting hydroxylamine to nitrite
3, 4. Thus, N
2O from nitrification should reflect the
18O signature of soil O
2, while the O in N
2O from nitrifier denitrification can come either from soil O
2 or H
2O, depending on which O is split off in the reduction of NO
2- to N
2O. It was assumed that a) no preferential removal of
18O or
16O takes place during nitrifier denitrification or denitrification and b) no O-exchange between H
218O and NO
3- takes place. These assumptions were tested and could be validated for the soil investigated. The results of the new method were compared with those of a conventional inhibition method using low concentrations of acetylene and high concentrations of oxygen
5. Compared to the isotope methodology, the inhibitor approach overestimated the contribution from nitrification at the expense of denitrification. Interesting shifts in N
2O-producing processes with changing WFPS and fertilizer type are discussed.
References
1. Wrage N, Velthof GL, Oenema O, Laanbroek HJ. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2004; 47: 13.
2. Baggs EM, Richter M, Cadisch G, Hartwig UA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2003; 35: 729.
3. Schmidt H-L, Voerkelius S. Isotopes in Nature, 5th working meeting: Leipzig, 1989.
4. Voerkelius S. Technical University: Munich, 1990.
5. Webster EA, Hopkins DW. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1996; 22: 331.