William F. Schillinger, Washington State University, Dryland Research Station, P.O. Box B, Lind, WA 99341, Stephen M. Dofing, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, 21888 N. 950th Rd., Adair, IL 61411, and Robert I. Papendick, 540 SE Crestview St., Pullman, WA 99163.
Some farmers in the Inland Pacific Northwest, USA, have reported lower grain yield of spring cereals with no-till (NT) compared to conservation tillage (CT). A 4-yr field study was conducted in a 300 mm annual precipitation zone to determine tillage method and sowing rate effects on seed-zone water, seed-zone temperature, plant stand, grain yield, grain yield components, and straw production for three spring-sown cereal species. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and oat (Avena sativa L.) were sown at 120, 200, and 280 seeds m-2 in a split-plot design with NT and CT as main plots and sowing rate x cereal species combinations as subplots. Factors other than tillage method (i.e., drill, sowing date, fertilizer rate, sowing depth) were held constant. There were no differences in plant stand between NT and CT, but grain yield was reduced by 5% in NT in part due to less water in the seed zone compared to CT during early plant development. Disruption of capillary continuity with CT appeared to restrict upward movement of water, resulting in greater retention of water in the seed zone underlying the depth of tillage. Grain yield was not affected by sowing rate for any crop species because increased number of heads per unit area and kernels per head consistently compensated for reduced plant stand density. With precise seed placement, sowing rate of spring cereals can be reduced by 50% or more from rates commonly used.
Back to Agricultural Systems: Weeds, Planting Dates, and Plant Densities
Back to A08 Integrated Agricultural Systems
Back to The ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meetings (November 6-10, 2005)