Tomoaki Morishita, Shigehiro Ishizuka, Tadashi Sakata, Shinji Kaneko, and Masamichi Takahashi. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Matsunosato 1, Tsukuba, 3058687, Japan
Temperate forest soil is a source of CO2 and N2O, and a sink of CH4, but the effects of thinning and clear-cutting on these GHGs dynamics are not understood well. We monitored GHGs fluxes from soil surface before and after forest management at 14 sites from northern to southern Japan. The soil temperatures at the thinning/clear-cutting plots were relatively higher in summer and lower in winter, possibly due to decrease or absence of canopy cover. No clear changes in soil moisture were observed after thinning/clear-cutting. The CO2 and N2O emissions and CH4 uptake rates increased with increase in soil temperature in all sites. The influence of thinning/clear-cutting was different among the GHGs or sites. In 5 sites subject to thinning/clear-cutting (indicated “*” in the Table), the CO2 emission rate increased in the two sites with dense understory, while it decreased in the other three sites. This decline in CO2 emission may result from the decrease in root respiration or organic carbon supply such as litterfall due to fewer understories. The CH4 uptake rates increased and N2O emission rates decreased in the cedar sites and CH4 uptake rates decreased and N2O emission rates increased in Black Soil (Andisols) sites. Our results suggest that the changes in substrate supply of nitrification rate after thinning/clear-cutting might affect these flux rates. In conclusion, the effect of thinning/clear-cutting on GHGs fluxes in Japanese forest soils has wide variety due to changes in soil temperature and nutrient dynamics in the sites.
Table The condition and forest management of study sites. Site | Soil type | Vegetation | Annual mean temperature (oC) | Annual mean precipitation (mm) | Elevation (m) | control | thin. | clear |
HO | BFS | fir | 6.6 | 1416 | 260 | + | + | + |
AK | BFS | cedar | 9.8 | 1781 | 200 | + | + | + |
FU* | BFS | cedar | 12.2 | 1177 | 250 | + | + | + |
CH | BFS | cedar | 14.1 | 2658 | 260 | + | + | + |
NA* | BL | pine | 10.2 | 1370 | 900 | + | + | |
KI | BL | larch | 7.0 | 3982 | 1270 | + | + | |
AI* | BFS | cypress | 13.1 | 2279 | 440 | + | + | + |
WA | BFS | cedar | 13.4 | 3171 | 800 | + | + | |
TO | BFS | cedar | 11.4 | 2861 | 405 | + | + | + |
SH | BL | cedar | 13.1 | 2071 | 412 | + | + | |
EH* | BL | cypress | 12.8 | 3538 | 690 | + | + | + |
KO1 | BL | cypress | 9.6 | 4957 | 1150 | + | + | |
KO2 | BFS | cypress | 13.1 | 4462 | 710 | + | + | |
KA* | BFS | cedar | 14.8 | 3540 | 420 | + | + | + |
‘*’ indicates that measurements were conducted for a year before thinning/clear-cutting.
BFS, brown forest soils (Gleyic, Dystric cambisols); BL, black soils (Andisol or Fluvisol)
Cedar, Cryptomeria japonica; cypress; Chamaecyparis obtuse
‘+’ indicates established plot.